Motor learning-induced new dendritic spines are preferentially involved in the learned task than existing spines
Cell Reports, ISSN: 2211-1247, Vol: 40, Issue: 7, Page: 111229
2022
- 10Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef5
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
Learning induces the formation of new synapses in addition to changes of existing synapse strength. However, it remains unclear whether new synapses serve different functions from existing synapses. By performing two-photon structural and Ca 2+ imaging of postsynaptic dendritic spines in layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons, we show that new spine formation increases in the mouse motor cortex 8–24 h after motor training. New spines, not existing spine populations, are preferentially active when mice perform the learned task rather than a new task. New spine activity is also more synchronized with dendritic/somatic activity when the learned task, not a new task, is carried out. Furthermore, new spines are formed to increase the task specificity in a subset of neurons, and their survival is not affected when a new task is learned. These findings suggest that newly formed synapses preferentially increase the task specificity of neurons over existing synapses at the retention stage of motor learning.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124722010464; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111229; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135886731&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977515; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211124722010464; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111229
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know