Thermodynamic modeling and uncertainty quantification of CO 2 -loaded aqueous MEA solutions
Chemical Engineering Science, ISSN: 0009-2509, Vol: 168, Page: 309-324
2017
- 39Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The accurate characterization of the thermodynamic models of a reactive solvent-based CO 2 capture system is essential for adequately capturing system behavior in a process model. Moreover, uncertainty in these models can significantly affect simulation results, although it is often neglected. With this incentive, a model of thermodynamic properties, including vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE), enthalpy, and solution chemistry, has been developed using a rigorous methodology for the aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) system as a baseline. The final thermodynamic framework consists of both a deterministic and stochastic model. The deterministic model is developed by regressing parameters of the e-NRTL activity coefficient model in Aspen Plus® to VLE, heat capacity, and heat of absorption data while downselecting the model’s large parameter space through use of information-theoretic criteria. The stochastic model is developed through an uncertainty quantification (UQ) procedure, using the results of the deterministic regression to determine a prior parameter distribution. This prior distribution and the experimental VLE data are used to derive a posterior distribution through Bayesian inference, which is used to represent the final stochastic model. A reaction model in which the kinetics are written in terms of the reaction equilibrium constants, to ensure consistency with the thermodynamics model, is developed. These new thermodynamic and reaction models are incorporated into an existing MEA system process model from the open literature, and the prior and posterior parameter distributions are propagated through the models. This provides valuable insight into the extent to which uncertainty in thermodynamic models affects key process variables, including CO 2 capture efficiency and energy requirement for solvent regeneration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009250917303007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.049; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019099116&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0009250917303007; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0009250917303007?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0009250917303007?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.049
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know