Hydrodynamics and liquid–solid mass transfer in micropacked bed reactors with copper foam packing
Chemical Engineering Science, ISSN: 0009-2509, Vol: 262, Page: 118033
2022
- 7Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Hydrodynamics and liquid–solid mass transfer in micropacked bed reactors (μPBRs) with copper foam packing are investigated. Effects of fluid superficial velocities, liquid viscosity, pore diameter of foam packing on the residence time distribution, liquid holdup, axial dispersion coefficient, and liquid–solid mass transfer coefficient are discussed. The liquid holdup of μPBRs can reach 0.23 ∼ 0.39, which is larger than that of packed bed reactors (0.05). The axial dispersion coefficient of μPBRs is 3.17 × 10 -6 ∼ 2.30 × 10 -5 m 2 /s, which is similar with that of packed bed reactors. The value of liquid–solid volumetric mass transfer coefficient with effect of axial dispersion coefficient in μPBRs can reach 0.033 ∼ 0.13 s −1, which is higher than that of packed bed reactors (0.006 ∼ 0.09 s −1 ). The empirical models of liquid holdup, axial dispersion coefficient, and liquid–solid mass transfer coefficient in single liquid phase flow and gas–liquid two phase flow of μPBRs are established and their predictions are in good agreement with experimental values.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009250922006170; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118033; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137288824&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0009250922006170; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2022.118033
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know