Hood-Assisted Colonoscopy Is More Effective in Detection of Colorectal Adenomas Than Narrow-Band Imaging
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 1542-3565, Vol: 8, Issue: 4, Page: 379-383
2010
- 34Citations
- 12Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef25
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Comparison of Two Devices During Colonoscopy; COLONAUX
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Endocuff vs Transparent Cap To Increase Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy CURRENT STATUS: Completed STUDY TYPE: Interventional SPONSOR AGENCY:Hospital General Universitario
Article Description
Colonoscopy, using either a transparent retractable extension device or narrow band imaging, is thought to improve colon adenoma detection. We compared the abilities of a transparent retractable extension device and narrow band imaging to detect colorectal adenomas. One hundred and seven patients with colonic adenomas that were detected by traditional colonoscopy were randomly assigned to groups that underwent a second colonoscopy that used either a transparent retractable extension or narrow band imaging; adenomas were removed. The principal outcome parameters were the number, size, shape, and location of adenomas detected. The patients' demographic characteristics, indications for colonoscopy, and cecal intubation times were similar between groups. Use of the transparent retractable extension resulted in detection of 31% more adenomas than the initial procedure ( P <.0001). The majority of newly discovered adenomas were sessile (79%; 26/33) and less than 5 mm in size (73%; 24/33). There was no significant increase in adenoma detection (5%) between first colonoscopy and second colonoscopy using narrow band imaging. Additional adenomas were found in 40.7% of patients that were examined using the transparent hood (22/54) versus 13.2% of those examined using narrow band imaging (7/53) ( P =.0028). Colonoscopy with a transparent retractable extension significantly improved the adenoma detection rate compared with repeat colonoscopy using narrow band imaging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356509008015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.08.018; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949655588&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716434; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542356509008015; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.08.018
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know