Reduced Cortical Thickness of Brain Areas Involved in Pain Processing in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 1542-3565, Vol: 10, Issue: 4, Page: 434-438.e1
2012
- 72Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations72
- Citation Indexes72
- 72
- CrossRef56
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
Patients with painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) might have abnormal brain function. We assessed cortical thickness in brain areas involved in visceral pain processing. We analyzed brain morphologies of 19 patients with painful CP and compared them with 15 healthy individuals (controls) by using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. By using an automated method with surface-based cortical segmentation, we assessed cortical thickness of the primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortex; prefrontal cortex (PFC); frontal cortex (FC); anterior (ACC), mid (MCC), and posterior (PCC) cingulate cortex; and insula. The occipital middle sulcus was used as a control area. The pain score was determined on the basis of the average daily amount of pain during 1 week. Compared with controls, patients with CP had reduced overall cortical thickness ( P =.0012), without effects of modification for diabetes, alcoholic etiologies, or opioid treatment (all P values >.05). In patients with CP, the cortical thickness was decreased in SII ( P =.002, compared with controls), PFC ( P =.046), FC ( P =.0003), MCC ( P =.001), and insula ( P =.002). There were no differences in cortical thickness between CP patients and controls in the control area ( P =.20), SI ( P =.06), ACC ( P =.95), or PCC ( P =.42). Cortical thickness in the affected areas correlated with pain score ( r = 0.47, P =.003). In patients with CP, brain areas involved in pain processing have reduced cortical thickness. As a result of long-term, ongoing pain input to the neuromatrix, cortical thickness might serve as a measure for overall pain system dysfunction, as observed in other diseases characterized by chronic pain.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356511012821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.024; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858705515&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22155560; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542356511012821; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.024
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know