Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 1542-3565, Vol: 21, Issue: 3, Page: 581-603.e33
2023
- 57Citations
- 88Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations57
- Citation Indexes57
- 57
- Captures88
- Readers88
- 88
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- News3
Most Recent News
Rise in early-onset CRC creates challenges in the clinic
Associate Professor Kimmie Ng The growing burden of early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has not yet been explained but the younger age of patients, diagnostic
Guideline Description
Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC. After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%. The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients. The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356522011715; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85146579486&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549470; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542356522011715; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.12.006; https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)01171-5/fulltext#.Y_1nR0cSWEU.twitter; http://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542356522011715/abstract; http://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542356522011715/fulltext; http://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542356522011715/pdf; https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)01171-5/abstract; https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)01171-5/fulltext; https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(22)01171-5/fulltext?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=AGA-posts&utm_source=twitter
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know