A Newly Proposed Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis is Associated With Baseline Clinical Features and Successful Treatment Response
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 1542-3565, Vol: 21, Issue: 10, Page: 2534-2542.e1
2023
- 18Citations
- 32Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef3
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
AGA announces new partnership with Target RWE to gather real world data on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and Target RWE have partnered to significantly expand real-world data available for serious, and o
Target RWE to implement AGA’s EoE severity index tool in new research study. Bethesda, MD (April 15, 2024) - The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and
Article Description
The Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE) was recently developed. We aimed to determine the relationship between features of eosinophilic esophagitis and disease severity, and assess change in disease severity with topical corticosteroid treatment, using I-SEE. We performed a post hoc analysis of an 8-week randomized trial comparing 2 topical corticosteroid formulations in newly diagnosed patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. I-SEE was calculated at baseline and posttreatment, and patients were classified as mild (1–6 points), moderate (7–14 points), severe (≥15 points), or inactive (0 points). We analyzed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features at baseline by disease severity, and examined the change in severity before and after treatment, and by histologic response (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). Of 111 subjects randomized, 20 (18%) were classified as mild, 75 (68%) as moderate, and 16 (14%) as severe at baseline. Increasing severity was associated with lower body mass index (30 for mild, 27 for moderate, 24 for severe; P =.01), longer duration of dysphagia symptoms before diagnosis (9 years for mild, 9 for moderate, and 20 for severe; P <.001), and decreasing esophageal diameter (15 mm for mild, 13 for moderate, and 10 for severe; P <.001). Mean severity score decreased after treatment (11 vs 4; P <.001), with lower scores in histologic responders compared with nonresponders (2 vs 9; P <.001). The severity score at baseline predicted need for dilation at follow-up (C statistic, 0.81). The newly developed I-SEE correlates with many clinical features at diagnosis, and severity improves with successful topical corticosteroid treatment. Additional investigations in other populations can further confirm its utility.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356523002744; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.047; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85160098340&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061110; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1542356523002744; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.047
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know