Facilitating the evolution of cooperation through altruistic punishment with adaptive feedback
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, ISSN: 0960-0779, Vol: 173, Page: 113669
2023
- 22Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The stability and persistence of cooperation are often threatened by the selfish behavior of self-interested individuals. One possible solution to this problem is to punish self-interested individuals. However, previous research always assumes that the strength of punishment is constant and independent of the game environment, which does not align with many real-world situations. Hence, it remains unclear whether altruistic punishment strategy with adaptive feedback can promote the evolution of cooperation effectively. Here we introduce the punishment strategy with adaptive feedback into the public goods game and develop a coevolutionary game model where the strength of punishment is dynamically adjusted based on the level of cooperation in a population. We adopt a linear feedback form to characterize the impact of strategies on punishment intensity. Through theoretical analysis and numerical calculations, we identify an evolutionary oscillation dynamics, in which the system cycle between high-intensity and low-intensity punishment, as well as cooperation and defection behaviors. Furthermore, we find that a high level of cooperation can be sustained with the use of only a low-intensity punishment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077923005702; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113669; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162078894&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960077923005702; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113669
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know