Chemical Biology Approaches to Genome Editing: Understanding, Controlling, and Delivering Programmable Nucleases
Cell Chemical Biology, ISSN: 2451-9456, Vol: 23, Issue: 1, Page: 57-73
2016
- 77Citations
- 190Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations77
- Citation Indexes49
- 49
- CrossRef31
- Patent Family Citations28
- Patent Families28
- Captures190
- Readers190
- 190
Review Description
Programmable DNA nucleases have provided scientists with the unprecedented ability to probe, regulate, and manipulate the human genome. Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-Cas9 system (CRISPR-Cas9) represent a powerful array of tools that can bind to and cleave a specified DNA sequence. In their canonical forms, these nucleases induce double-strand breaks at a DNA locus of interest that can trigger cellular DNA repair processes that disrupt or replace genes. The fusion of these programmable nucleases with a variety of other protein domains has led to a rapidly growing suite of tools for activating, repressing, visualizing, and modifying loci of interest. Maximizing the usefulness and therapeutic relevance of these tools, however, requires precisely controlling their activity and specificity to minimize potentially toxic side effects arising from off-target activities. This need has motivated the application of chemical biology principles and methods to genome-editing proteins, including the engineering of variants of these proteins with improved or altered specificities, and the development of genetic, chemical, optical, and protein delivery methods that control the activity of these agents in cells. Advancing the capabilities, safety, effectiveness, and therapeutic relevance of genome-engineering proteins will continue to rely on chemical biology strategies that manipulate their activity, specificity, and localization.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245194561500478X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.12.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84965050728&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26933736; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S245194561500478X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.12.009; https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=http://www.cell.com/ccbio/pdf/S2451-9456(15)00478-X.pdf&ct=ga&cd=CAIyGjljODU3N2MwZjhlODUwMjA6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNFow0g5VaZbc4lN5hmXHzJ73JgSvw&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter; https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=http://www.cell.com/ccbio/pdf/S2451-9456(15)00478-X.pdf&ct=ga&cd=CAIyGmM5N2UwMjA4OTcwYzc2MjA6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNFow0g5VaZbc4lN5hmXHzJ73JgSvw&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S245194561500478X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know