Mobility of insecticide residues and main intermediates in a clay-loam soil, and impact of leachate components on their photocatalytic degradation
Chemosphere, ISSN: 0045-6535, Vol: 274, Page: 129965
2021
- 26Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This work assesses the behavior (adsorption, degradation and leaching) of four insecticides (chlorantraniliprole, thiametoxam, imidacloprid and pirimicarb) and their main reaction intermediates in a clay-loam textured soil (1.6% OM). Following the batch equilibrium method, the K OC (as log values) ranged from 1.2 to 3.9 (thiametoxam and pirimicarb, respectively). All the insecticides were moderately persistent (t ½ = 39–100 days) in the following order: thiametoxam > imidacloprid > pirimicarb > chlorantraniliprole. Two major transformation products, desmethyl-formamido pirimicarb and desmethyl pirimicarb, were formed as consequence of dealkylation of the parent compound. Using disturbed soil columns only thiametoxam (93% of the initial amount) and imidacloprid (42% of the initial amount) were recovered from leachates. In the case of pirimicarb and chlorantraniliprole, 74% and 30%, respectively, were recovered from the soil. Thiametoxam and imidacloprid can be catalogued as mobile compounds, while pirimicarb and chlorantraniliprole are classified as immobile according to the screening indices used (GUS and ELI). Leachates containing thiametoxam and imidacloprid were subjected to photocatalytic treatment for 240 min using TiO 2 /Na 2 S 2 O 8 with the help of a photochemical reactor equipped with LED lamp. Both compounds had a very fast degradation rate (half-lives ≤ 0.5 min) in deionized water, while their half-lives were 112 min and 178 min, respectively, in leaching water. This implies a strong effect of the water matrix composition, mainly due to organic matter dissolved (quenching). Only traces of thiametoxam urea and hydroxy imidacloprid were detected during the photocatalytic experiment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653521004343; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129965; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101321275&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33979936; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045653521004343; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129965
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know