The environmental and economic consequences of environmental centralization: Evidence from China's environmental vertical management reform
China Economic Review, ISSN: 1043-951X, Vol: 84, Page: 102127
2024
- 7Citations
- 19Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Environmental Protection Findings from Shanghai Jiao Tong University Reported (The Environmental and Economic Consequences of Environmental Centralization: Evidence From China's Environmental Vertical Management Reform)
2024 APR 15 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Daily China News -- Researchers detail new data in Environment - Environmental Protection.
Article Description
Environmental decentralization enhances local autonomy accountability and initiatives. However, some evidence suggests that it might foster a race to the bottom in environmental protection, exacerbating cross-border pollution. Consequently, certain areas in China initiated the vertical management reform of environmental protection agencies (VMR), characterized by centralization, in 1992. The relatively exogenous shock on firms helps to identify the causal effect of VMR on pollution and production. Using the combined data of ASIF and ESR from 1998 to 2013, along with collected policy details at the county-level, we utilize the staggered DID design. Our findings demonstrate that VMR significantly reduces approximately 22.94% of COD emissions from industrial firms. This reduction is achieved through passive approaches such as reducing production, decreasing the entry of firms, and increasing the rate of firms shutting down. Additionally, a proactive approach of increasing the wastewater treatment capacity of individual facilities contributes to this reduction. The impact of VMR is significant in polluting industries, large-scale firms, and firms located at administrative boundaries, mainly driven by local officials with strong promotion incentives. The paper underscores the advantages of environmental centralization, particularly the role of VMR in addressing environmental pollution, especially in the context of transboundary issues. However, due to information asymmetry within centralization, its implementation incurs high economic costs, necessitating more precise and sophisticated regulation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24000166; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102127; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183919088&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1043951X24000166; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102127
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know