A method to calculate the ranges of criteria weights in ELECTRE I and II methods
Computers & Industrial Engineering, ISSN: 0360-8352, Vol: 137, Page: 106067
2019
- 25Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, the ranges of criteria weights based on the outranking relations in ELECTRE I and II methods are analyzed, which is considered as the sensitivity analysis regarding criteria weights. First, an important theorem is proved, in which the maximum value of discordance indices for any two alternatives is shown to be equal to 1. Using this theorem, four situations of outranking relations for any two alternatives are simplified to two situations when sensitivity analysis of criteria weights is performed for ELECTRE I. Subsequently, some inequalities are obtained to calculate the ranges of criteria weights when keeping the outranking relations between any two alternatives unchanged. For ELECTRE II, nine situations of strong and weak outranking relations are simplified into three situations of relations according to this theorem. The ranges of criteria weights are also derived when the strong and weak outranking relations remain unchanged. Finally, two examples are presented to test and verify the effectiveness of the sensitivity analysis of criteria weights for ELECTRE I. Two analogous examples are also presented in ELECTRE II.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835219305261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106067; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072609688&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360835219305261; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360835219305261?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360835219305261?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106067
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know