Explainable machine learning models for defects detection in industrial processes
Computers & Industrial Engineering, ISSN: 0360-8352, Vol: 192, Page: 110214
2024
- 2Citations
- 58Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Machine learning algorithms in non-linear pattern recognition for defect detection in manufacturing processes are increasingly prevalent in the context of Industry 4.0. This scenario enables factories to develop methodologies for monitoring and controlling the quality of their products, obtaining better operational efficiency indicators, and offering increasingly competitive products in the market. Explainable Artificial Intelligence can facilitate understanding how the models make decisions and assist in tracking anomaly points. This paper proposes an explainability framework for machine learning models in defect detection. This work applied the multinational industry’s approach to the tire manufacturing process. Models such as random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, light gradient boosting machine, logistic regression, support vector machine, and multi-layer perceptron were considered to evaluate the performance of tires in compliance with production standards. Statistical methodologies had to be adopted to deal with the small number of samples training the machine learning models. The random forest and logistic regression models achieved the best performances with an accuracy of 92% and 96%, respectively. The Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations and SHapley Additive exPlanations methods were used to identify the relevant process variables. The approach presents the global and local interpretations of the results, allowing for a deeper understanding of how process variables discriminate the fault. The proposed framework determines reference values for each selected process variable for tire manufacturing in compliance with quality standards. This approach provides a relevant tool for quality control management in tire manufacturing industries.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224003358; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110214; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193566439&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360835224003358; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110214
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know