Trombo pediculado en aorta ascendente y cayado aórtico: a propósito de un caso clínico
Cirugía Cardiovascular, ISSN: 1134-0096, Vol: 29, Issue: 1, Page: 57-60
2022
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Case Description
La presencia de un trombo en el cayado aórtico sin anomalías es inusual, sin embargo, supone un reto para el clínico. Por un lado, su diagnóstico suele ser incidental o secundario a una embolia sistémica y, por otro, no existe consenso para su tratamiento debido a la falta de estudios aleatorizados. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 54 años que ingresó en la unidad de reanimación tras ictus isquémico de la arteria cerebral media izquierda no revascularizable. Una angiografía por tomografía computarizada con contraste evidenció un trombo pediculado de 7 cm en la aorta torácica con origen en la aorta ascendente medio-distal, aparentemente sin otras anomalías. Se realizó extracción completa del trombo y de la membrana en la base de implantación ante la sospecha de un posible síndrome aórtico agudo. El examen histológico confirmó la presencia de fibrina, sin embargo, los estudios de laboratorio no establecieron una causa principal que justificara la formación del trombo. Flotant thrombus in the aortic arch without abnormalities is unusual. Arterial embolic disease continues to challenge clinicians. The diagnosis is usually incidental or secondary to a systemic embolism, although there are no randomized controlled trials for consensus as to its treatment. A 54-year-old man was admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit after a nonrevascularizable left middle cerebral ischaemic stroke. CTA with contrast showed a 7-cm pedunculated thrombus in the thoracic aorta originating from the mid ascending aorta and arch, without other abnormalities. Complete removal of the thrombus and complete resection of the basement membrane were performed due to the suspicion of a possible acute aortic syndrome. Histological examination confirmed the presence of fibrin, however, laboratory studies did not establish a main cause that justified the formation of the thrombus.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009621001364; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.circv.2021.07.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120787094&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1134009621001364; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.circv.2021.07.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know