Practical Challenges of Point-of-Care Testing
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, ISSN: 0272-2712, Vol: 43, Issue: 2, Page: 155-165
2023
- 17Citations
- 41Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- Usage41
- Abstract Views41
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Review Description
The practical challenges of point-of-care testing (POCT) include analytical performance and quality compared with testing performed in a central laboratory and higher cost per test compared with laboratory-based tests. These challenges can be addressed with new test technology, consensus, and practice guidelines for the use of POCT, instituting a quality management system and data connectivity in the POCT setting, and studies that demonstrate evidence of clinical and economic value of POCT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272271223000161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2023.02.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150842172&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37169439; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272271223000161; https://scholarlyworks.beaumont.org/pathology_laboratory_medicine_articles/219; https://scholarlyworks.beaumont.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1219&context=pathology_laboratory_medicine_articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2023.02.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know