Cross-validation of prediction equations for estimating the body fat percentage in adults with obesity
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, ISSN: 2405-4577, Vol: 41, Page: 346-350
2021
- 5Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef1
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
An accurate estimation of the body fat percentage (BF%) in patients with obesity is of clinical importance. Therefore, we aim to assess the validity of anthropometric-based BF predictive equations in treatment-seeking patients in an outpatient setting. BF% was assessed by Tanita MC-780MA bioimpedance (BIA) and considered as a reference method, and anthropometric-based predictive equations were used in BF% estimations among 275 adults of both genders, in the outpatient clinic of the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at Beirut Arab University (Lebanon). The mean differences between the measured and estimated BF% values were calculated to assess the accuracy of five equations, and the Bland–Altman method was used to assess the level of agreement. In both males and females, all predictive equations gave significantly different estimates of BF% when compared to those measured by BIA. On the other hand, in both genders, the mean difference between the BF% value estimated by the Jackson equation and that measured using BIA, was not significant, and agreement was confirmed using Bland-Altman plots. We suggest the Jackson equation for accurate BF% estimation in both genders of patients with obesity in the Lebanese population. However, future studies are still urgently needed to develop and validate new predictive equations suitable for BF% estimations, taking into account ethnicity (i.e., the Arab population).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405457720310780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.11.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096171933&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487288; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405457720310780; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.11.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know