The Role of Neuroimaging in Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Neonates
Clinics in Perinatology, ISSN: 0095-5108, Vol: 41, Issue: 1, Page: 257-283
2014
- 103Citations
- 149Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations103
- Citation Indexes103
- 103
- CrossRef82
- Captures149
- Readers149
- 149
Review Description
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a safe and high-resolution neuroimaging modality that is increasingly used in the neonatal population to assess brain injury and its consequences on brain development. It is superior to cranial ultrasound for the definition of patterns of both white and gray matter maturation and injury and therefore has the potential to provide prognostic information on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of the preterm population. Furthermore, the development of sophisticated MRI strategies, including diffusion tensor imaging, resting state functional connectivity, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, may increase the prognostic value, helping to guide parental counseling and allocate early intervention services.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095510813001292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84893743609&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24524459; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095510813001292; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2013.10.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know