Antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and their predictors among healthcare workers in a tertiary referral hospital in Japan
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, ISSN: 1198-743X, Vol: 27, Issue: 12, Page: 1861.e1-1861.e5
2021
- 97Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations97
- Citation Indexes96
- CrossRef96
- 95
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Article Description
This study aimed to determine antibody responses in healthcare workers who receive the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and identify factors that predict the response. We recruited healthcare workers receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at the Chiba University Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Center. Blood samples were obtained before the 1st dose and after the 2nd dose vaccination, and serum antibody titers were determined using Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2S, an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. We established a model to identify the baseline factors predicting post-vaccine antibody titers using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. Two thousand fifteen individuals (median age 37-year-old, 64.3% female) were enrolled in this study, of which 10 had a history of COVID-19. Before vaccination, 21 participants (1.1%) had a detectable antibody titer (≥0.4 U/mL) with a median titer of 35.9 U/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 7.8 – 65.7). After vaccination, serum anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibodies (≥0.4 U/mL) were detected in all 1774 participants who received the 2nd dose with a median titer of 2060.0 U/mL (IQR 1250.0 – 2650.0). Immunosuppressive medication (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), time from 2nd dose to sample collection (p < 0.001), glucocorticoids (p = 0.020), and drinking alcohol (p = 0.037) were identified as factors predicting lower antibody titers after vaccination, whereas previous COVID-19 (p < 0.001), female (p < 0.001), time between 2 doses (p < 0.001), and medication for allergy (p = 0.024) were identified as factors predicting higher serum antibody titers. Our data demonstrate that healthcare workers universally have good antibody responses to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The predictive factors identified in our study may help optimize the vaccination strategy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X21004377; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.042; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113765695&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34375755; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1198743X21004377; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.042
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know