Assessing thermal maturity beyond the reaches of vitrinite reflectance and Rock-Eval pyrolysis: A case study from the Silurian Qusaiba formation
International Journal of Coal Geology, ISSN: 0166-5162, Vol: 180, Page: 29-45
2017
- 83Citations
- 56Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Thermal maturity assessment in pre-Devonian shales is challenging due to the absence of vitrinite macerals that form the basis for vitrinite reflectance petrography, the most-widely used technique for organic maturity assessment. This paper presents an integrated analysis of thermal maturity on the basis of alternative spectroscopic and geochemical techniques in lieu of conventional organic petrography, applied in four drilled wells in the pre-Devonian (Silurian) Qusaiba Member of the Qalibah Formation in northwestern Saudi Arabia. The techniques comprise both bulk sample (Rock-Eval pyrolysis, infrared and Raman spectroscopy), and kerogen isolate analysis (elemental, density, surface area, and X-ray absorption near edge structure), with each method calibrated to the vitrinite reflectance scale. Rock-Eval pyrolysis, a common alternative to vitrinite reflectance measurements, provided unreliable maturity estimates in the majority of samples because of low S2 signal. In contrast, the other techniques defined a consistent and narrow maturity range within each well, and revealed a wide range of maturity between the wells. On the basis of the spectroscopic and geochemical results, equivalent vitrinite reflectance for the Qusaiba Member in northwestern Saudi Arabia ranges from at least 0.9 ± 0.1 to 2.1 ± 0.2%Ro, demonstrating significant variation in its maturation history. The integrated assessment of maturity across multiple wells provides data that can be used to construct maturity maps for oilfield exploration and appraisal. More generally, the methods and calibrations for thermal maturity presented here can be used to establish vitrinite-reflectance-equivalent maturities in shales as a complement to or especially in the absence of conventional maturity estimates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516217301143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.07.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85025443284&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166516217301143; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.07.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know