Interacting with agents without a mind: the case for artificial agents
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, ISSN: 2352-1546, Vol: 51, Page: 101282
2023
- 6Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Humans may deprive each other of human qualities if the social context encourages it. But what about the opposite: do people attribute human traits to non-human entities without a mind, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Perceived humanness is based on the assumption that the other can act (has agency) and has experiences (thoughts and feelings). This review shows that AI fails to fully elicit these two dimensions of mind perception. Embodied AI may trigger agency attribution, but only humans trigger the attribution of experience. Importantly, people are more likely to attribute mind in general and agency specifically to AI that resembles the human form. Lastly, people’s pre-dispositions and the social context affect people’s tendency to attribute human traits to AI.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154623000360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101282; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161303029&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352154623000360; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101282
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know