Proposing processomics as the methodology of food quality monitoring: reconceptualization, opportunities, and challenges
Current Opinion in Food Science, ISSN: 2214-7993, Vol: 45, Page: 100823
2022
- 14Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Empirical single-response targeted approaches encounter challenges for quality evaluation-based process design and optimization, particularly in cases where novel processing techniques are employed. Processomics is recently proposed through integrating chemical fingerprinting and kinetic modeling in the context of food processing and preservation. At present, processomics mainly considers the headspace volatilome characterized by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, thus contributing to biases in chemical fingerprinting. It is hypothesized that major quality attributes influenced by processes-induced chemical reactions can be designated through mapping-related chemical network and markers. Correspondingly, we propose the incorporation of other omics technology platforms, including liposomics, peptidomics, and proteomics, to provide the overall perspectives of the variations in chemical fingerprinting responding to the impact of extrinsic processing variables, followed by kinetic mechanistic modeling of the identified chemical markers pointing to quality-related reactions. Particularly, considering the complexity of flavor perception, sensomics can also be introduced as a special dimension of quality assessment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221479932200025X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100823; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128383964&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221479932200025X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100823
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know