Numerical investigation and assessment of flamelet-based models for the prediction of pulverized solid fuel homogeneous ignition and combustion
Combustion and Flame, ISSN: 0010-2180, Vol: 235, Page: 111693
2022
- 21Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The homogeneous ignition and volatile combustion of pulverized solid fuel in single-particle and particle group configurations were studied numerically in a laminar flat flame burner. Simulations with increasing particle streams were performed to investigate the influence of the interactions in particle groups on homogeneous ignition and combustion. An extensive set of simulations are conducted considering models with different levels of detail for both the gas-phase and solid fuel chemistry. The reference simulations employ the chemical percolation devolatilization model coupled with a detailed chemistry model for gas-phase reactions. The particle-fluid interactions were modeled with a fully coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian framework. Increased ignition delay times for higher particle streams were successfully validated against available experimental measurements. Furthermore, the transition from single-particle ignition to a conically shaped volatile flame with suppressed reactions near the flame base in particle group combustion was observed in both experiments and simulations. The subsequent detailed investigations revealed that the increased heat transfer to particles and, therefore, lower gas temperature for higher particle number densities together with the local oxygen depletion are the primary reasons for this transition. Based on the reference simulation, different simplified model combinations were assessed. The systematic model reduction investigation started with assessing the fixed volatile composition as a required assumption for flamelet models. Finally, the effects of gas-phase chemistry and different simple devolatilization models on ignition and combustion chemistry were studied. Overall, all model combinations provide reasonable predictions of volatile combustion with minor local deficits in the studied conditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218021004363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111693; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114936336&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010218021004363; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111693
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know