The outlook for platonic and cubic gauche nitrogens
Computational Materials Science, ISSN: 0927-0256, Vol: 123, Page: 31-39
2016
- 5Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
While polynitrogens are proposed to be the hyper rocket fuels, many of their properties in the solid states are unclear. Herein, we comprehensively investigated the thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities, polymorphs, and rocket performances of platonic and cubic gauche nitrogens, i.e. tetrahedral N 4, cubic N 8, platonic dodecahedral N 20 and cubic gauche nitrogen (cg-N), using the first-principles calculations. The results showed that the dissociation barrier of tetrahedral N 4 in the gas phase (>200 kJ mol −1 ) is high enough to keep stable. It would be a liquid monopropellant under slight external pressure or low temperature. The specific impulse ( I sp ) of tetrahedral N 4 is comparable to that of liquid H 2 /O 2, but it provides a density of 1.459 g cm −3 with the body centered tetragonal packing. The conversion barrier of cubic N 8 in the gas phase (∼85 kJ mol −1 ) is marginal for stability. It may be a solid at ambient temperature, and its I sp exceeds that of liquid H 2 /O 2. The crystal density of cubic N 8 is 1.964 g cm −3 with the rhombohedral centered hexagonal packing. The dissociation barrier for stability of platonic N 20 in the gas phase (∼25 kJ mol −1 ) is insufficient, however it possesses a lattice energy above 100 kJ mol −1. Although the I sp of platonic N 20 is as powerful as that of the liquid H 2 /O 2, it has a crystal density of 2.132 g cm −3 with the face centered cubic packing. For surface relaxation, cg-N is unstable at the ambient condition with a dissociation barrier of ∼17 kJ mol −1. While the I sp of cg-N is less than those of platonic nitrogens, its effective impulse ( I ef ) is the best due to an extremely high density of 3.401 g cm −3. In respect of the thermodynamics, the enthalpies per atom of platonic nitrogens are always higher than those of cg-N and ε-N 2 from 0 to 100 GPa.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025616302828; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.06.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84976338387&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927025616302828; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.06.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know