A crystal symmetry-invariant Kobayashi–Warren–Carter grain boundary model and its implementation using a thresholding algorithm
Computational Materials Science, ISSN: 0927-0256, Vol: 199, Page: 110575
2021
- 7Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One of the most important aims of grain boundary modeling is to predict the evolution of a large collection of grains in phenomena such as abnormal grain growth, coupled grain boundary motion, and recrystallization that occur under extreme thermomechanical loads. A unified framework to study the coevolution of grain boundaries with bulk plasticity has recently been developed by [1], which is based on modeling grain boundaries as continuum dislocations governed by an energy based on the Kobayashi–Warren–Carter (KWC) model [2,3]. While the resulting unified model demonstrates coupled grain boundary motion and polygonization (seen in recrystallization), it is restricted to grain boundary energies of the Read–Shockley type, which applies only to small misorientation angles. In addition, the implementation of the unified model using finite elements inherits the computational challenges of the KWC model that originate from the singular diffusive nature of its governing equations. The main goal of this study is to generalize the KWC functional to grain boundary energies beyond the Read–Shockley-type that respect the bicrystallography of grain boundaries. The computational challenges of the KWC model are addressed by developing a thresholding method that relies on a primal dual algorithm and the fast marching method, resulting in an O(NlogN) algorithm, where N is the number of grid points. We validate the model by demonstrating the Herring angle and the von Neumann–Mullins relations, followed by a study of the grain microstructure evolution in a two-dimensional face-centered cubic copper polycrystal with crystal symmetry-invariant grain boundary energy data obtained from the covariance grain boundary model of [4,5].
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025621003025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110575; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113634677&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927025621003025; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110575
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know