COMODO: Configurable morphology distance operator
Computational Materials Science, ISSN: 0927-0256, Vol: 244, Page: 113208
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Data-driven approaches have been recognized as a new paradigm for establishing and exploring process-morphology-property relationships. However, typical exploration methods deliver high-dimensional morphologies that pose the challenge of extracting the key features and patterns that could guide the processing and materials design. The high dimensionality also hampers the organization of the data and the associated data analytics. As a solution, the currently available approaches either take a simplified view of the morphology, e.g., focusing on pixels in the morphology images, or apply transformations that average out structural descriptors of morphologies. To address these shortcomings, we propose a new computationally efficient and configurable distance operator that takes an intermediate approach. Our main idea is to represent the morphology as a graph where graph connectivity reflects the relative arrangement of components (e.g., grains, droplets) in the morphology, and the label of the graph vertices captures the domain-specific information of each characteristic domain. Next, given the graph abstraction, the distance between morphologies is computed using vectorized graph-based representation. Because both morphology graph structure and associated signature functions have clear interpretations, our distance measure can be easily tailored to specific applications. Our results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed approach on data from simulation and synthetic data, including in real-world applications like morphologies clustering.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624004294; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113208; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198561212&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927025624004294; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113208
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know