Classification enhanced machine learning model for energetic stability of binary compounds
Computational Materials Science, ISSN: 0927-0256, Vol: 244, Page: 113277
2024
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
As contemporary computational technologies and machine learning methodologies rapidly evolve, machine learning (ML) models for predicting formation enthalpies of materials exhibited convincible numerical precision and remarkable predictive efficiency, thus establishing a solid foundation for materials thermodynamic design. Despite achieving numerically high global probability accuracy, current ML models for formation enthalpy nonetheless exhibit suboptimal local accuracy within specific physical domain, which can be attributed to the misalignment between the physical constraints of chemical bonds and the critical descriptors capturing class-specific traits. Herein, we propose a novel approach to improve the local precision of the ML model for predicting formation enthalpy by utilizing Miedema theory-based classification, which segments data into distinct categories according to the electronegativity difference, electron density discontinuity and atomic size difference. Utilizing ML algorithms to build surrogate models guided by the classification strategy significantly improves the local predictive accuracy of formation enthalpy for specific binary compounds, significantly raising the R 2 value from 0.4–0.9 to 0.8–0.9 compared to an unclassified method. Furthermore, feature importance analysis demonstrates that the pivotal factors for each category vary in some manner, highlighting the insufficiency of a sole ML model in classifying large-dimensional data, which can be addressed by adopting a physics-informed classification strategy. Our results suggest that employing physical-informed classification scheme into ML equips the models with broad applicability and local accuracy, which also shed light for other material properties predication.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025624004981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113277; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200564995&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927025624004981; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113277
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know