RTIFed: A Reputation based Triple-step Incentive mechanism for energy-aware Federated learning over battery-constricted devices
Computer Networks, ISSN: 1389-1286, Vol: 241, Page: 110192
2024
- 2Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Federated Learning (FL) is an emerging field of research that contributes to collaboratively training machine learning models by leveraging idle computing resources and sensitive data scattered among massive IoT devices in a privacy-preserving manner without raw data exchange. The majority of existing research has concentrated on developing efficient learning algorithms that demonstrate superior learning performance. Despite the extraordinary advancement, FL encounters three challenges that need to be resolved jointly, specifically, (1) how to properly measure the client reliability and contribution that serve as the basis for compensation allocation, (2) how to reasonably activate reliable clients, whose dataset grows gradually, to avoid over-learning, and (3) how to efficiently formulate the optimal local training decisions to improve model performance and energy efficiency of battery-constricted devices. To address the above challenges, this paper proposes a R eputation based T riple-step I ncentive mechanism of Fed erated learning (RTIFed), which (1) introduces reputation as the metric to measure client reliability and contribution while employing blockchain to accomplish decentralized and tamper-resistant reputation management, (2) activates clients with high reputation and informative data pursuant by a Richness-of-Information Activation Strategy (RIAS), (3) determines training epochs for each client based on a Stackelberg Game according to an Optimal Training Decision Strategy (OTDS). Numerical results clearly show that the proposed RTIFed effectively motivates high-quality clients and improves learning accuracy while reducing the energy cost to meet the low resource consumption need of battery-constricted devices in smart city FL scenarios.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128624000240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110192; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183454721&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389128624000240; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110192
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know