Monitoring plant diseases and pests through remote sensing technology: A review
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, ISSN: 0168-1699, Vol: 165, Page: 104943
2019
- 397Citations
- 587Usage
- 769Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations397
- Citation Indexes394
- 394
- CrossRef32
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage587
- Abstract Views587
- Captures769
- Readers769
- 769
Review Description
Plant diseases and pests endanger agriculture and forestry significantly around the world. The implementation of non-contact, highly-efficient, and affordable methods for detecting and monitoring plant diseases and pests over vast areas could greatly facilitate plant protection. In this respect, different forms of remote sensing methods have been introduced for detecting and monitoring plant diseases and pests in many ways. This review outlines the state-of-the-art research achievements in relation to sensing technologies, feature extraction, and monitoring algorithms that have been conducted at multiple scales. Based on their characteristics and maturity in detecting and monitoring plant diseases and pests, sensing systems are classified into groups that include: visible & near-infrared spectral sensors (VIS-NIR); fluorescence and thermal sensors; and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and light detection and ranging (Lidar) systems. Based on the data acquired from these remote sensing systems and sensitivity analysis, a variety of remote sensing features are proposed and identified as surrogates in the detection and monitoring processes. They include (1) optical, fluorescence, and thermal parameters; (2) image-based landscape features; and (3) features associated with habitat suitability. We also review the algorithms that link the remote sensing features with the occurrence of plant diseases and pests for identifying, differentiating and determining severity of diseases and pests over large areas. The algorithms including statistical discriminant analyses, machine learning algorithms, regression-based models and spectral unmixing algorithms using data collected at a single time or multiple times. Finally, according to the review, we provide a general framework to facilitate the monitoring of an unknown disease or pest highlighting future challenges and trends.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816991930290X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104943; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070915924&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016816991930290X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016816991930290X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016816991930290X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2260; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3246&context=geo_facpub; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/2260; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3246&context=geo_facpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104943
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know