Application of non-destructive sensors and big data analysis to predict physiological storage disorders and fruit firmness in ‘Braeburn’ apples
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, ISSN: 0168-1699, Vol: 183, Page: 106015
2021
- 21Citations
- 54Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Apples to apples: Neural network uses orchard data to predict fruit quality after storage
A researcher from Skoltech and his German colleagues have developed a neural network-based classification algorithm that can use data from an apple orchard to predict how well apples will fare in long-term storage. The paper was published in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.
Article Description
Physiological storage disorders affect a range of commercially important pomefruit and result in fruit losses and wastage of resources. Disorders can develop during and/or after storage and symptoms are strongly influenced by the growing environment and orchard management. Furthermore, fruit which receive similar orchard management and storage can vary greatly in disorder incidence and severity. Biological systems are complex and simple cause-and-effect approaches have not up until now resulted in robust methods to predict disorder risk. Reliable predictions are needed by fruit industries worldwide to better manage fruit production processes, to determine optimal harvest dates and long-term storage regimes. The current work proposes a new methodological approach to model ‘Braeburn’ apple disorder risk. Autoregressive time series (ARX) models via model identification techniques for chlorophyll, anthocyanins, soluble solids and dry matter content were obtained from weather conditions and different orchard management treatments and then served as input into a classifier for internal browning, cavities and fruit firmness after long-term controlled atmosphere storage. The classification results for internal browning disorder show a 90% agreement between two separate years and for fruit firmness an 80% success rate was obtained by training the classifier with two years of data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169921000338; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106015; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100454687&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168169921000338; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know