Improved Na + estimation from hyperspectral data of saline vegetation by machine learning
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, ISSN: 0168-1699, Vol: 196, Page: 106862
2022
- 23Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Monitoring the growth state of vegetation using remote sensing is the current trends in agricultural research. This study aims to identify an optimal hyperspectral vegetation extraction framework to improve leaf Na + monitoring in the northwestern part of China based on the hyperspectral data of saline vegetation. The Partial Least Squares (PLS), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) models were constructed to model the leaf Na +, while the Aggregated Boosted Tree (ABT) and Random Forest (RF) variable importance screening methods were used to optimize the variables in the leaf Na + extraction. Then, the optimal variable screening method and the model of inverting vegetation Na + was identified. The results showed that the estimation of Na + content within saline vegetation leaves by constructing spectral indices is feasible as 33 vegetation indices meets the requirements, the RF (R 2 = 0.73, RMSE = 0.50) and PLS (R 2 = 0.72, RMSE = 0.59) models are relatively good, followed by the SVM (R 2 = 0.68, RMSE = 0.53) model. In addition, all the three models have been improved using the ABT variable importance screening method, where the RF (R 2 = 0.81, RMSE = 0.42) model had the most satisfactory effect. Similarly, based on the RF importance screening method, all the three models have improved significantly, among which the most effective was the SVM (R 2 = 0.82, RMSE = 0.45) model. This study indicates that ABT-RF and RF-SVM are the most ideal combination framework to invert the Na + content of saline vegetation leaves. This study brings out some inspiration for the combination between the screening approach of variables and model building, improving the accuracy of hyperspectral sensor to monitor the changes in the relevant chemical characteristics of vegetation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816992200179X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106862; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126287890&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016816992200179X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106862
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know