A cardiovascular model for renal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
Computers in Biology and Medicine, ISSN: 0010-4825, Vol: 119, Page: 103676
2020
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef3
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication following cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). It is likely that poor renal perfusion contributes to the occurrence of AKI, via renal hypoxia, so it is imperative to maintain optimal renal perfusion during CPB. We have developed a straightforward cardiovascular perfusion model with parameter values calibrated against experimental and/or clinical data from several independent studies of CPB in humans and animals. Following model development and calibration, we performed a one-at-a-time parametric study to investigate the response of renal perfusion to several variables during CPB, namely pump flow (denoted CO for ‘cardiac output’), renal vascular resistance, and non-renal vascular resistance. From the parametric study, we have found that all three parameters had a similarly strong influence on renal perfusion. We simulated three potential strategies for maintaining optimum renal perfusion during CPB and tested their effectiveness. The strategies were: (1) increasing the pump flow; (2) administrating noradrenaline (vasopressor); and (3) administrating fenoldopam (renal vasodilator). Simulations have revealed that administration of fenoldopam is likely to be the most effective of the three strategies. Other findings from our simulations are that increasing pump flow is less effective when central venous pressure is elevated. Further, renal autoregulation is likely inoperative during CPB, as evidenced by an unchanging renal vascular resistance with increasing CO and blood pressure. The cardiac-renal perfusion model developed in this study can be linked with other kidney models to simulate the changes in renal oxygenation during CPB.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482520300688; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103676; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85080032578&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339121; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010482520300688; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103676
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know