A hybrid first-order and WENO scheme for the high-resolution and computationally efficient modeling of pollutant transport
Computers & Fluids, ISSN: 0045-7930, Vol: 225, Page: 104951
2021
- 4Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To improve the modeling quality of pollutant transport in shallow waters, different reconstruction schemes have been proposed to better link the edge values to the centroid values of a pollutant concentration in finite-volume shallow water models: a scheme of higher (lower) order generally has a better (poorer) quantitative accuracy but lower (higher) computational efficiency. Here, a numerical comparative study of several classical schemes is first conducted under a variety of pollutant distribution conditions. The results reveal that, for the condition of relatively uniform pollutant distribution, the numerical accuracy of a lower-order scheme (such as the first-order scheme or the MUSCL scheme) may be similar to that of a higher-order scheme (such as the WENO scheme). The second-order derivative of the concentration, here termed the nonlinear indicator (NI), correlates well with the discrepancies between the numerical solutions and analytical solutions. A threshold value of approximately 10−7∼10−6 m -2 for the NI is identified, above which a higher-order scheme may be required. Based on this understanding, a hybrid first-order and WENO scheme is proposed. Numerical case studies show that the hybrid scheme can successfully combine the efficiency of the first-order scheme with the high accuracy of the WENO scheme for pollutant modeling.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793021001183; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104951; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106258181&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045793021001183; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104951
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know