Predicting the near field underwater explosion response of coated composite cylinders using multiscale simulations, experiments, and machine learning
Composite Structures, ISSN: 0263-8223, Vol: 283, Page: 115157
2022
- 10Citations
- 524Usage
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef1
- Usage524
- Downloads503
- Abstract Views21
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Prediction of underwater explosion response of coated composite cylinders using machine learning (ML) requires a large, consistent, accurate, and representative dataset. However, such reliable large experimental dataset is not readily available. Besides, the ML algorithms need to abide by the fundamental laws of physics to avoid non-physical predictions. To address these challenges, this paper synergistically integrates ML with high-throughput multiscale finite element (FE) simulations to predict the response of coated composite cylinders subjected to nearfield underwater explosion. The simulated responses from the multiscale approach correlate very well with the experimental observations. After validation of the multiscale approach, a representative and consistent dataset containing more than 3800 combinations is developed using high-throughput multiscale simulation by varying the fiber/matrix/coating material properties, coating thickness as well as experimental variables such as explosive energy and stand-off distance. The dataset is leveraged to predict the response of coated composite cylinders subjected to nearfield underwater explosion using a feed-forward multilayer perceptron-based neural network (NN) approach which shows excellent predictions. Overall, the synergistic approach powered by physics-based simulations presented here can potentially enable materials scientists and engineers to make intelligent, informed decisions in the purview of innovative design strategies for underwater explosion mitigation in composite structures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822321015725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115157; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121933081&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263822321015725; https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/mece_fac/127; https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=mece_fac; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cve_facpubs/403; https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1402&context=cve_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115157
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know