Characterizing the flexural/damage behavior of Aluminosilicate glass at low/high loading rates: Application of SHPB for mode-1 loading of laminated glass
Composite Structures, ISSN: 0263-8223, Vol: 329, Page: 117816
2024
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Understanding the flexural response of monolithic and laminated glass is essential for making informed choices while selecting glass for varying applications. That is because the behavior of monolithic and laminated glass may not necessarily be the same under certain loading conditions and assessing their performance differences helps in determining their suitability for specific applications. The presented work is aimed at quantifying the flexural/damage behavior of monolithic and laminated glass. Quasi-static and dynamic flexural tests were conducted on monolithic and laminated glass in mode-1 loading while maintaining identical loading and support interfaces. In the first phase, quasi-static flexural tests were performed, and results were quantitatively compared by two approaches: Effective Thickness Approximation (ETA) and the theory of Thick Sandwiched Beams (TSB). Experimentally observed deflection corroborated with both the analytical methods; the absolute error remained less than 2.5 % and 0.5 % for ETA and TSB, respectively. Importantly, failure of the laminate was witnessed at approximately 50 % lower force compared to its monolithic counterpart, which was attributed to the span length of the specimen and the interlayer’s shear stiffness. Fractography was performed to elicit Aluminosilicate glass’s mirror constant and fracture surface energy, as 1.86 MN/m 3/2 and 3.95 J/m 2, respectively. In Phase-2, Dynamic flexural tests were conducted on a novel Electromagnetic Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (ESHPB), and an experimental–numerical coupled approach was introduced to analyze the results. The results established that the adverse effects of shorter span length on the flexural strength of laminated glass are mitigated, primarily due to the viscoelastic response of the interlayer. The reprographic images attributed the fracture of monolithic and laminated glass specimens solely to the bending-induced stresses.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822323011625; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117816; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180402274&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263822323011625; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117816
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know