The molecular basis of social behavior: models, methods and advances
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, ISSN: 0959-4388, Vol: 23, Issue: 1, Page: 3-10
2013
- 35Citations
- 211Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef27
- Captures211
- Readers211
- 211
Review Description
Elucidating the molecular and neural basis of complex social behaviors such as communal living, division of labor and warfare requires model organisms that exhibit these multi-faceted behavioral phenotypes. Social insects, such as ants, bees, wasps and termites, are attractive models to address this problem, with rich ecological and ethological foundations. However, their atypical systems of reproduction have hindered application of classical genetic approaches. In this review, we discuss how recent advances in social insect genomics, transcriptomics, and functional manipulations have enhanced our ability to observe and perturb gene expression, physiology and behavior in these species. Such developments begin to provide an integrated view of the molecular and cellular underpinnings of complex social behavior.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438812001419; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84872858771&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22995551; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959438812001419; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know