Studying different silica sources for preparation of alternative waterglass used in preparation of binary geopolymer binders from metakaolin/boiler slag
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 227, Page: 116621
2019
- 42Citations
- 106Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The production of geopolymeric binders based on metakaolin (MK), coal boiler slag (BS) and alternative silica sources (rice husk ash (RHA) and silica fume (SF)) to produce potassium waterglass was successfully carried out. The binders were characterized microstructurally and mechanically at different ages. Monitoring of the reactions of the cements was carried out by techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTG). The results show that byproducts such as BS and RHA can be used with MK as starting materials for the preparation of geopolymer binders. The using of by-product rich on silica produces materials with microstructures similar to those traditionally obtained with commercial potassium silicate (PS). Regarding SF-based binders, the strength declines over time, with late-age instability. The most stable or homogeneous binders over time are those based on RHA. The MK/BS30 binder exhibits good mechanical performance 42.1, 51.04 and 48.3 MPa at 7, 180 and 360 days respectively. The MK/BS30 binder shows a high degree of geopolymerization, a more homogeneous and enhanced connectivity between the grains and geopolymer gel and likewise, a lower content of MK unreacted. In general, the results indicate that geopolymers manufactured with RHA could replace materials produced with commercial silicates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061819320318; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070366952&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061819320318; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know