Numerical and experimental analyses for rubber-sand particle mixtures applied in high-filled cut-and-cover tunnels
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 306, Page: 124874
2021
- 14Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With the rapid development of the automobile industry and transportation, the disposal of scrap tires has become an internationally recognized economic and environmental problem. Fortunately, high-filled cut-and-cover tunnels (first construction and then layered backfill) provide ideal solutions for waste treatment and resource reuse as mixtures of scrap tire rubber particles and sand are used as lightweight fill material (LFM) in high-fill cut-and-cover tunnels (HFCCT). Because the backfill above the cut-and-cover tunnel (CCT) requires a large quantity of material, an appropriate ratio of scrap tire rubber particles and sand should be selected as the LFM mixture. If LFM of different thicknesses is buried above the CCT, it will inevitably bring varying degrees of influence on the earth pressure around the CCT, leading to structural deformation and soil settlement above the CCT. In this paper, a method of combining numerical simulation and model test is presented to help analyze the macroscopic and micromechanical properties of LFM through the stress–strain change and the contact force chain distribution. In the model test, certain factors influencing the earth pressure, the structural deformation, and the soil settlement mentioned above are considered, including the fill height and the embedding depth of the LFM. The results show that when the rubber fraction by volume (RF) is between 30% and 45%, the deformation and load-bearing capacity of the LFM are the most stable. Moreover, a suitable rubber fraction by volume (RF = 40%) and backfill height (between 0.63 ∼ 0.83 times the height of the CCT) can eliminate the stress concentration at the top center of the CCT.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061821026258; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124874; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115031756&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061821026258; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124874
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know