Shear behavior of stud connectors in steel bridge deck and ballastless track structural systems of high-speed railways
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 341, Page: 127744
2022
- 9Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Steel bridges with ballastless tracks have been increasingly used in high-speed railways (HSRs). This kind of steel bridge deck and ballastless track structural system can be considered a steel and multilayer concrete composite structure (SMCCS). However, rare information is available about the shear behavior of stud connectors embedded in the SMCCS. To address this research gap, it was extensively investigated through push-out tests and finite element (FE) analyses in this research. Three groups of experiments including a total of nine push-out specimens with single-layer or double-layer concrete slabs were performed, and the failure mode, load-slip curve, shear capacity, and shear stiffness were presented and discussed. Refined three-dimensional nonlinear FE models were established and verified using the push-out tests. Based upon the FE models, the shear behavior of stud connectors in the SMCCS was further studied, and the effects of key variables on the shear behavior of studs were discussed. Moreover, the design shear capacities of stud connectors calculated using the current design codes were evaluated, and the design recommendations were presented. The results indicate that double-layer concrete slab and group effect will reduce the shear performance of studs. The stud diameter and yield strength have a significant effect on the shear behavior of studs. The shear performance of studs improves with the increasing stud diameter and yield strength. Lower shear strength of the concrete-concrete interface will cause the interface cracking of the push-out specimen, which occurs before the stud shear failure. The results can provide essential data for future analysis and design of steel bridges and ballastless tracks for HSRs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061822014192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127744; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130096123&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061822014192; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127744
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know