Characterization and optimization of eco-friendly cementitious materials based on titanium gypsum, fly ash, and calcium carbide residue
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 349, Page: 128635
2022
- 31Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Titanium gypsum (TG), fly ash (FA) and calcium carbide residue (CCR) are harmful industrial by-products that need to be addressed. In this study, TG, FA and CCR were selected to prepare the eco-friendly FA-TG-CCR (FTC) cementitious materials. Respond surface methodology (RSM) was undertaken to optimize and understand the influence of design factors of m(TG/FA), m(CCR/FA) and W/B on compressive strength, and the mechanical properties, microstructure, hydration mechanism and environmental performance of FTC cementitious materials were investigated. The morphology and structure were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry- differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) and Scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), the concentration of hazardous elements was determined via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES). The results show that the optimal mixture with RSM methodology (m(TG/FA) = 30.80 %, m(CCR/FA) = 27.85 %, W/B = 0.62) reached 18.93 MPa at 28 days of curing, which confirmed via experimental verification. The FTC cementitious materials are mainly consist with C-(A)-S-H, ettringite; the existence of Fe 3+ was disadvantageous to early age strength, however partial Fe 3+ participated in the formation of Fe-ettringite as the curing time increased, which is beneficial to later age strength. The leaching results indicate that the FTC materials can effectively consolidate the heavy metal ions in raw materials, and the leaching concentration of ions all meet the Chinese Standard for Pollution Control on the Landfill Site of Municipal Solid Waste. Therefore, the synergistic of FTC material offers a novel approach to the efficient utilization of original TG and other industrial by-product wastes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061822022929; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128635; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136575140&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061822022929; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128635
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know