Enhancing high-content recycled asphalt pavement regeneration: A laboratory separation and treatment approach
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 412, Page: 134868
2024
- 4Citations
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Report Summarizes Building and Construction Study Findings from Southeast University (Enhancing High-content Recycled Asphalt Pavement Regeneration: a Laboratory Separation and Treatment Approach)
2024 FEB 01 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Daily Real Estate News -- Data detailed on Building and Construction have been
Article Description
The escalating costs of aggregates and stringent sustainable development policies have emphasized the significance of effective high-content recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) regeneration technology. This study aims to present a novel laboratory separation and treatment approach for RAP materials, ensuring optimal performance of high-content RAP recycled asphalt mixtures. The proposed method is compared against factory-separated RAP materials in terms of agglomeration evaluation and mixture performance comparison. High- and low-temperature performance of the recycled asphalt mixture were evaluated through wheel tracking and trabecular bending tests. Furthermore, the moisture sensitivity of the recycled mixture was studied through immersion Marshall and freeze-thaw splitting tests. The uniformity and fusion between aggregates and asphalt in the recycled asphalt mixtures were meticulously analyzed using advanced techniques such as Scanning Electron Microscope and industrial Computed Tomography scans. The laboratory separation method encompasses flexible separation for 5–10 mm RAP materials and rigid separation for 10–20 mm RAP materials. Notably, the laboratory separation methods proved more effective in removing aged asphalt from the surface of 10–20 mm RAP materials compared to factory separation, thereby enhancing the adhesion between aggregates and asphalt and ensuring a more uniform recycled mixture. Although the dynamic stability of recycled asphalt mixture was reduced using laboratory separation, it still meets the requirements of relevant specifications. Moreover, the low-temperature maximum flexural tensile strain of the recycled asphalt mixture increased by 16%, with the residual stability and tensile strength ratio rising by 1.33% and 2.69%, respectively. Compared with the factory separation method, the laboratory separation method reduces the porosity percentage of the recycled asphalt mixture cross-section by 3.47%. Overall, the laboratory separation method for RAP materials provides valuable insights for enhancing the factory processing of RAP materials, contributing to the successful application of high RAP content regeneration technology in the pursuit of sustainable and cost-effective road construction practices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824000096; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134868; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181586416&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950061824000096; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134868
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know