Reciprocal frame (RF) architecture design based on statistical analysis of geometrical form parameters from built cases and parametric simulations
Construction and Building Materials, ISSN: 0950-0618, Vol: 447, Page: 138082
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Based on empirical case data and parametric simulations, this study employs statistical induction to explore a design methodology of reciprocal frame (RF) at the initial design stage. Specifically, 3 primary parameters that influence the RF global morphology are identified as the maximum span (L1), the minimum radius of curvature (C), and the span-to-arch ratio (λ); 2 principal parameters affecting the dimensions of RF components are collated as the maximum length (L2) and the maximum cross-sectional area (S). Following an analysis of the tectonic relationship and data distribution in built cases, RF are classified into 2 primary types — node-type & unit-type — and further divided into 5 subtypes. The conclusive findings illustrate the superiority of the unit-type over the node-type in terms of greater L 1 and spanning efficiency (L 2 -S), but the unit-type's adaptability to λ and C within curved surface is considerably lower than that of the node-type. Furthermore, the study unearths prediction domains for the 2 primary RF types across L 1 -L 2, L 1 -S, C-L 2, and λ-L 2, derived from parametric modelling and structural finite element analysis. These domains define the structurally permissible extremes of component volumes, serving as effective tools for the initial design inspiration, assisting in the overall design reference of structure-morphology synchronized design.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know