Protocol from a randomized clinical trial of multiple pharmacotherapy adaptations based on treatment response in African Americans who smoke
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, ISSN: 2451-8654, Vol: 30, Page: 101032
2022
- 2Citations
- 22Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
New Clinical Trials and Studies Data Have Been Reported by Researchers at University of Kansas School of Medicine (Protocol from a randomized clinical trial of multiple pharmacotherapy adaptations based on treatment response in African ...)
2022 DEC 12 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Disease Prevention Daily -- Fresh data on clinical trials and studies are presented
Article Description
The standard of care in tobacco treatment is to continue individuals who smoke on the same cessation medication, even when they do not stop smoking. An alternative strategy is to adapt pharmacotherapy based on non-response. A handful of studies have examined this approach, but they have adapted pharmacotherapy only once and/or focused on adaptation distal rather than proximal to a failed quit attempt. Few studies have included racial/ethnic minorities who have less success in quitting and bear a disproportionate share of tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. The current study is comparing the efficacy of optimized (OPT) versus enhanced usual care (UC) for smoking cessation in African Americans (AA) who smoke cigarettes. AAs who smoke (n = 392) are randomized 1:1 to OPT or UC. Participants in both groups receive 7 sessions of smoking cessation counseling and18-weeks of pharmacotherapy with long-term follow-up through Week 26. OPT participants receive nicotine patch and up to two pharmacotherapy adaptations to varenicline and bupropion plus patch based on carbon monoxide verified smoking status (≥6 ppm) at Weeks 2 and 6. UC participants receive patch throughout the duration of treatment. We hypothesize that OPT will be more effective than UC on the primary outcome of biochemically verified abstinence at Week 12. If effective, findings could broaden the scope of tobacco dependence treatment and move the field toward optimization strategies that impro ve abstinence for AA who smoke. NCT03897439.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865422001491; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101032; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141258061&origin=inward; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03897439; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36387983; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2451865422001491; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101032
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know