When and why does gossip increase prosocial behavior?
Current Opinion in Psychology, ISSN: 2352-250X, Vol: 44, Page: 315-320
2022
- 9Citations
- 54Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
- Mentions4
- News Mentions4
- 4
Most Recent News
How TikTok became a place for tattletales
“I hate to stick my nose where it doesn’t belong but if your name is Marissa, please listen up,” begins one TikTok with 15.7 million
Review Description
Understanding when people behave prosocially is integral to solving many challenges in groups and society. Gossip–the exchange of information about absent others—has been proposed to increase prosocial behavior, but findings are mixed. In this review, we illuminate the relationship between gossip and prosocial behavior, reconcile disparate findings, and suggest new directions for research. Our review reveals that gossip increases prosocial behavior to the degree that a) it is accurate rather than inaccurate, b) targets are interdependent with, rather than independent from, gossip receivers, and c) targets anticipate that they might be gossiped about, rather than actually experience negative gossip. We discuss implications of our reviewed findings for understanding when gossip serves to uphold desirable behavior and when it inadvertently engenders undesirable behavior.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X21002232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120499629&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875505; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352250X21002232; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know