In situ 4D mechanical testing of structural materials: The data challenge
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, ISSN: 1359-0286, Vol: 24, Issue: 4, Page: 100834
2020
- 13Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This papers presents recent progress with materials investigations via in situ mechanical testing at the synchrotron, so called 4D experiments. More automated and more integrated stress rigs now allow to produce new kind of data sets to study deformation and fracture of structural materials. Two recent examples are presented, one with a polymer material and another one with a polycrystalline metallic alloy. Challenges with data organisation and storage and automatic analysis are discussed in the view of the upgrade of the main synchrotron sources which will greatly increase the number and size of the future data sets.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359028620300322; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100834; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088099094&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359028620300322; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1359028620300322?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1359028620300322?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100834
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know