Editorial overview: Leveraging the multiple values of nature for transformative change to just and sustainable futures — Insights from the IPBES Values Assessment
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, ISSN: 1877-3435, Vol: 64, Page: 101359
2023
- 18Citations
- 57Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Addressing the nature crisis requires systemic transformations in society, especially regarding what and how political and economic decisions are made, and understanding how we take everyday decisions that affect our relations towards nature. Underpinning transformational change towards more just and sustainable futures thus requires assessing the role that nature’s values play in decision-making across scales and how valuation methods and approaches can best guide decisions. Given the diversity of the values of nature, it is key to map out what those values look like, and how they are formed and evolve over time in relation to institutions (i.e. society’s conventions, norms and rules). This special issue draws on the IPBES Values Assessment published in 2022 and engages with key questions about the role of values and valuation of nature for transformative change towards more just and sustainable futures. The special issue presents papers that review topics about how to conceptualise value diversity and undertake valuation to guide decisions geared towards transformative change. It also focuses on how power, justice and socio-environmental conflicts intersect with nature’s values, and the role of diverse values in conservation and development policy instruments.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001069; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101359; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171741841&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877343523001069; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101359
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know