The 35% carbon dioxide test in stress and panic research: Overview of effects and integration of findings
Clinical Psychology Review, ISSN: 0272-7358, Vol: 32, Issue: 3, Page: 153-164
2012
- 35Citations
- 88Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes34
- CrossRef34
- 34
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures88
- Readers88
- 88
Review Description
The carbon dioxide test—a vital capacity breath of air containing 35% carbon dioxide (CO 2 )—provokes panic attacks in many individuals with panic disorder (PD). It has thus been extensively used as an experimental model of panic and less frequently as a clinical method of provoking symptoms for interoceptive exposure treatment. Recently, stress researchers have suggested another use for the CO 2 test: that of an acute physiological stressor indexing the human stress response. The purpose of this review is to synthesize findings about the effects of the CO 2 test from both the panic and stress literatures in order to advance understanding about this increasingly popular test. Both panic and stress researchers have examined the fleeting effects of the CO 2 test, finding that the test engenders transient breathlessness, dizziness, and minor anxiety in most participants and panic attacks in those with or at risk for PD. Physiological measurements after the test indicate a brief homeostatic disruption in many bodily systems, including increased respiration, systolic blood pressure, and noradrenaline, and decreased heart rate. Most studies indicate increased cortisol. Possible benefits of integrating findings from the panic and stress research lines, given their common use of the CO 2 test, are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735812000025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84857970457&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22322014; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272735812000025; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know