Radiomics nomogram: distinguishing benign and malignant pure ground-glass nodules based on dual-layer spectral detector CT
Clinical Radiology, ISSN: 0009-9260, Vol: 79, Issue: 10, Page: e1205-e1213
2024
- 2Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To investigate the value of the combined model based on spectral quantitative parameters, radiomics features, imaging and clinical features to distinguish the benign and malignant pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). A retrospective analysis of 113 patients with single pGGNs who underwent non-contrast enhancement examination of the chest on dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT) with two weeks before surgery was performed in our hospital. These patients were randomized into training and testing cohorts. Regions of interest based on the conventional 120 kVp poly energetic image of SDCT were outlined. Then the optimal features were extracted and selected to construct radiomic model. A combined model combining vacuole sign, electron density (ED) value and the rad score of radiomics model was built by logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was built in a training cohort and the performance of the models was evaluated in the training and testing cohorts by receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis. ED value [Odds Ratio (OR):1.100; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.027–1.166)] and vacuole sign (OR:3.343; 95% CI:0.881–12.680) were independent risk factors for the malignant pGGNs in the training cohort. A combined model was constructed using radiomics features, ED value and vacuole sign. And the AUC was 0.910 (95% CI, 0.825–0.997) and 0.850 (95% CI, 0.714–0.981) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The combined model based on SDCT has high specificity and sensitivity for distinguishing the benign and malignant pGGNs, suggesting the model can further improve diagnostic performance, and using a nomogram is helpful for individualized predictions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000992602400299X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.06.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198544330&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39013667; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000992602400299X
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know