Mode of inheritance and biochemical mechanisms underlying lambda-cyhalothrin and bifenthrin resistance in the laboratory-selected two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae
Crop Protection, ISSN: 0261-2194, Vol: 137, Page: 105280
2020
- 16Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetrancyhidae) is one of the most economically important pests among spider mites, due to the number of hosts that it harms in agricultural fields and greenhouses, and to its remarkable ability to develop resistance to chemicals applied in a short time. Pyrethroids are among the most widely used insecticides to control this pest. In this study, the biochemical mechanisms and inheritance mode of lambda cyhalothrin and bifenthrin resistance in T. urticae were investigated. A greenhouse population (BEYDOM) of T. urticae was selected for eight cycles in the laboratory with lambda cyhalothrin and bifenthrin by a spray tower-Petri dish method using the LC 90 of a standard susceptible population (GSS). After eight selection cycles, the BEYDOM population was found 18.24-fold resistant to lambda cyhalothrin and 74.23-fold resistant to bifenthrin compared with the GSS based on LC 50 values. Reciprocal and backcross studies revealed that the inheritance of lambda cyhalothrin resistance was sex-linked, incompletely dominant, and was probably under the control of more than one gene at lower doses and a single gene at higher doses, while inheritance to bifenthrin resistance was autosomal and incompletely recessive and may be controlled by one gene. Biochemical and synergism experiments suggested that monooxygenases and carboxylesterase enzymes play an essential role in the resistance to these pyrethroids, whereas glutathione S-transferases were not found to have a significant effect. These results provide valuable information in terms of designing an effective resistance management strategy to retard or avoid the development of resistant T. urticae populations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219420302131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105280; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087845498&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261219420302131; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0261219420302131?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0261219420302131?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105280
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know