Antifeedant activity of guayule resin and its compounds against the agricultural pest Labidostomis lusitanica
Crop Protection, ISSN: 0261-2194, Vol: 175, Page: 106434
2024
- 1Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
The economic sustainability of guayule ( Parthenium argentatum A. Gray) cultivation will largely depend on its profitability, which drives strategies for the integral utilization of its biomass. Because guayule resin has been proposed as a broad-spectrum biopesticide, the aim of the present study was to test and compare its bioactivity against the agricultural pest Labidostomis lusitanica (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Germar, with essential oils (EOs) from thyme ( Thymus vulgaris L.), savory ( Satureja montana L.), and oregano ( Origanum vulgare L.). Repellency, oviposition and feeding inhibition activity were measured using free choice assays under controlled conditions, and minimal inhibitory concentrations of guayule resin fractions and isolated compounds were determined. Finally, guayule resin was tested under simulated field conditions. Results showed that the solvent used to dissolve and apply the resin had a great impact on its performance. Guayule crude resin was more active than tested EOs, particularly as an antifeedant. However, its activity did not seem to be concentration dependent, and was effective within a narrow range. In contrast to low molecular-weight rubber (LMWR), which acted as attractant, the refined resin was repellent. Nevertheless, the two different enriched resin fractions, with sesquiterpene bioactive compounds acted as attractants and feeding stimulants, as well as the isolated compounds. In the semi-field trial, crude guayule resin again showed repellency and feeding deterrence, with no mortality, overall suggesting that while guayule resin is active against L. lusitanica, the compounds responsible for this activity are likely not the sesquiterpenes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219423002570; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106434; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85173055223&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261219423002570; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106434
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know