Understanding the influence of AMG 510 on the structure of KRAS G12C empowered by molecular dynamics simulation
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, ISSN: 2001-0370, Vol: 20, Page: 1056-1067
2022
- 7Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef5
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
The KRAS G12C mutant is often associated with human cancers, and AMG 510 as a promising covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C has achieved surprising efficacy in clinical trials. However, the interaction mechanism between KRAS G12C and AMG 510 is not completely understood. Here, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations on the complex of KRAS G12C -AMG 510 to explore the influence of this covalent inhibitor on the conformational change of KRAS G12C. A PCA (Principal Component Analysis) model was constructed based on known KRAS crystal structures to distinguish different conformations (active, inactive, and other). By mapping simulation trajectories onto the PCA model, we observed that the conformations of KRAS G12C bound with AMG 510 were mainly concentrated in the inactive conformation. Further analysis demonstrated that AMG 510 reduced the flexibility of two switch regions to make the complex of KRAS G12C -AMG 510 restricted in the inactive conformation. In the meantime, we also identified key interacting residues between KRAS G12C and AMG 510 through the calculation of binding energy. Finally, we built a series of KRAS second-site mutation systems (i.e. KRAS G12C/mutations ) to conduct large-scale screening of potential resistance mutations. By further combining MD simulations and the PCA model, we not only recapitulated the currently known resistance mutations of AMG 510 successfully but also proposed some novel potential resistant mutations. Taken together, these results broaden our insight into the influence of AMG 510 on the conformational change of the KRAS G12C mutant at the atomic level, thereby providing crucial hints for the improvement and optimization of drug candidates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037022000587; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.02.018; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125488327&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284050; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2001037022000587; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.02.018
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know